So Christians should strive to do the objective research, in order that they not provide bad untruthful arguments and appear unread. Oneness Pentecostal Sources of Authority: Oneness Pentecostals of all branches affirm the authority of the Bible for doctrine. 6th ed. For example, many in UPCI consider the writings of Frank Ewart and John G. Scheppe as authoritative. This movement denies the Trinity, arguing instead that Jesus is himself the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. Concerning the baptismal view of the most rigid Oneness Pentecostals, he states, "It is on this issue, theologians say, that Oneness Pentecostals have drifted dangerously toward spiritual elitism and heresy." 14 Indeed, the Oneness view of baptism is lethally flawed. There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. United Pentecostals, also called Oneness Pentecostals, are known for their rejection of the Trinity, which is a hallmark doctrine in orthodox Christianity.
Answering Oneness arguments - Let Us Reason Official Names and Membership (estimates): Apostolic Overcoming Holy Church of God (AOHCG)-13,000 5:18). Instead, you should focus on the biblical teachings within the text and not use non-biblical philosophy. Now, I want to use an argument that the Oneness Pentecostals use all the time in this vein of thought, who will often counter the argument opposing Acts 2:38 (Salvation) . First and third person personal pronouns: Throughout chapter 14, Jesus clearly differentiates Himself from the Father by using first person personal pronouns (I, Me, Mine) to refer to Himself and third person personal pronouns (He, Him, His) to refer to His Father (e.g., John 14:7, 10, 16). 8. asserting that God is one person) and (b) the basic theological errors of Oneness theology (e.g., denying the deity of the Son). He argues throughout for . The classic statement of Trinitarian doctrine is that there is One God who exists eternally in three Persons: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. So he broaches the subject from an intellectual concept. In 1913, one popular teacher, R.E. Paper. There Are Different Kinds of Tongues Witnessing to Oneness Pentecostals: 1. Many, however, utilize only the King James Version to proof text their unique doctrines. 4. So, he establishes that he is speaking of tongues for edification. a. Spatial: near, beside, b. Moreover, when it found its way in the twentieth century, departing from the Trinitarian Pentecostals, it was again rejected by the church. His knowledge of living water from the Old Testament (Jeremiah 2:13, Isaiah 12:3, 58:11, etc) should have informed him. Pentecostals hold that believers do gain saving faith when they come to Christ. 1:1-13; Jude 1:1; Rev. While this book may be helpful insofar as it rehearses typical Oneness Pentecostal views and arguments, it is far from providing a substantial treatment of Scripture or a meaningful interaction with trinitarianism. It is knowing The Bible endorses slavery and oppression. Has anyone ever heard this before? Also, throughout chap 14 Jesus distinguishes Himself from the Father. Arguing unipersonalism (unitarianism) assumes a conclusion that is meant to be proved.
Books Refuting Oneness Pentecostal Beliefs - Spiritual Abuse But again Only by removing this passage from the document and immediate context can Oneness teachers posit a modalistic Oneness understanding. After that time, a number of oneness sects formed, most of which were predominately African-American. I wont give him this web page..too bad. Now, I recognize that this may be vulnerable to the counter-strike that the author simply did not record them speaking in tongues, but they probably still did. Use Amazon Smile for all your purchases to support the Department of Christian Defense. :
Oneness Pentecostals and the Trinity - Rightly Dividing the Word of Truth 2:16-17; 1 John 2:22-23).
Is the Baptism of the Holy Spirit Biblical? | Evidence Unseen Oneness theology rejects the eternality of the Person of the Son. Publish Date: Jul 20, 2016. Westminster Confession of Faith, 1:9. He was making claims that no mere human could make. It is a symbol of ones identification with the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.
REVIEW OF MICHAEL BURGOS, AGAINST - David K. Bernard | Facebook It is the final authority for the Christian on all matters of faith and doctrine. Church of Our Lord Jesus of the Apostolic Faith (COLJF)-30,000 Matthew 28:19 clearly reflects the trinitarian concept that the name (authority and characteristics) of the one God is incorporated in the three Persons of the Godhead: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit (see 1 Cor. Author: Michael R. Burgos Jr., Burgos Jr., Michael R. Format: Paperback. 2:18). No Christian used it as a pagan symbol, in the same way no Christian uses a calendar today on their wall to exalt the pagan gods of the days and months it representsthus, calendars were factually derived from pagan in origins. But in spite of where or when it first appeared, it has been associated to a vast number of meanings through time. See what Christian leaders are saying about Against Oneness Pentecostalism: "Michael Burgos has produced a brilliant blend of systematic theology and biblical exegesis with a detailed and thorough discussion of the main passages at the center of the dispute between Oneness Pentecostalism and traditional trinitarianism. Does this not seem to vindicate Oneness theology? Over fifty times, the Father, and Jesusare presented as explicitly distinct in the same passages (cf. asserting that God is one person) and (b) the basic theological errors of Oneness theology (e.g., denying the deity of the Son). is a must-read for any serious-minded Christian who wants to be better informed and better equipped to sanctify Christ as Lord . These false doctrines can affect teachings about justification, sanctification, the role and work of the cross and an understanding of the nature of God. Scripture quotation marked NKJV is from The New King James Version. This movement first emerged in America around 1914 as the result of doctrinal disputes within the nascent Pentecostal movement and claims . It would be to cherry-pick the verse that fits into ones doctrine. This is far, far more plausible than thinking that Jesus switched between him and I.. This interpretation is not an attempt to understand the text. They were strongly rejected by the denominations council that year, and the AOG adopted a strong trinitarian stance in its statement of faith. 30:3; John 14:23]; Yahweh to Yahweh and Elohim (God) to Elohim correspondences in passages such as Gen. 19:24; Ps. Mark 16:18 is part of a disputed portion of Marks text. "Michael Burgos has produced a brilliant blend of systematic theology and biblical exegesis with a detailed and thorough discussion of the main passages at the center of the dispute between Oneness Pentecostalism and traditional trinitarianism. [1] In Phil. If the Son has not eternally existed with (personally distinct from) the Father why then is the Son presented as the agent of creation, that is, the Creator Himself? And you are pretexting the passage with no consideration of the context of chap. Note also that in 14:10, Jesus clearly differentiates Himself from the Father when He declares: The words that I say to you I do not speak on My own initiative, but the Father abiding in Me does His works. To reiterate, the undisputable fact is this: not one time in the New Testament does Jesus (or any other person) state that He Himself is the Father. Brief content visible, double tap to read full content. 6:16). 50 This is the bread which comes down ek tou ouranou, so that one may eat of it and not die. UPCI: Apostolic Bible Institute-St. Paul, Minn. This is the greatest weakness of the Oneness position: For if the Son created, then, He eternally existed with the Father. John 3:13; 6:38, 46, 62; 8:23, 38, 42; 16:28). Further, the conversation that Jesus had with Nicodemus should not be overlooked. Throughout the passage, it is clear that Jesus is speaking of someone else. Wallace, BBGG, 630). Modalism rips the heart out of Christianityit denies Christ by misrepresenting Him. We dont share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we dont sell your information to others. Thus, because God is tri-personal He can be described as both Maker and Makers and as Creator and Creators. He is one Being, not one persona point that is repeatedly brought to bear by the OT authors. In spite of the (unclear) origins, the Triquetra has a rich meaning that has been used by the early church to signify the Trinity. Oneness/Jesus-only proponents will often say that this is a new revelation that came sometime during or after the Azusa Street Revival of 1906, which is generally regarded to be the birth of modern Pentecostalism. Some Pentecostal denominations, often referred to as Apostolic Pentecostals, Oneness Pentecostals or Jesus-Only Pentecostals, take the . biblical case against Oneness unitarianism.
A Trinitarian's Struggle With the Oneness Doctrine 14 and Johns theology. So, you appeal to v. 9, to assume Jesus is the person of the Father, but a verses later (v. 23), Jesus clearly affirms His deity as Son in distinction from the Father: Jesus answered and said to him, If anyone loves Me, he will keep My word; and MY FATHER will love him, and pros auton eleusometha [to him WE will come] and monn par autw poisometha [at home with him, WE will Make].. Phillip asked him, Show us the Father, Lord, and it will be enough for us. Jesus replied that Phillip should not need to ask this question, because, He who has seen me has seen the Father. Oneness Pentecostals will argue that Jesus was saying that he is the Father. Have a clear understanding of your faith and the Bible.
Is Oneness Pentecostalism a cult? Should it be considered a - reddit Isa. He says in verse 14 that he will ask the Father, and the Father will send the Holy Spirit.
Against Oneness Pentecostalism: An Exegetical-Theological Critique Thus, they are often referred to as the Jesus Only Movement. Brother Burgos carefully and respectfully dismantles the misguided half truths of Oneness doctrine. What Michael Burgos Jr. has produced in Against Oneness Pentecostalism is a helpful book for pastors or churchmen needing a polemical approach against the anti-Trinitarians embedded in our communities and occasionally, our churches. Of course, this is a mischaracterization. Note: there are many places in the OT where God is presented as multi-personal (e.g., plural nouns, verbs, nouns, prepositions, and plural adjectives were used of God, i.e., Us, Our, in Gen. 1:26-27; 3:22; 11:7-9; Isa. McAlister of Toronto, Ont., began teaching that the Trinity doctrine was untrue and that baptism should be done correctly in Jesus name only-not in the traditional trinitarian formula. Therefore, when they see Jesus, they see the only way to, and an exact representation of, the invisible unseen Father, for Jesus makes Him known, He explains or exegetes Him. For if Jesus is the Father, then, between whom would He Mediate since by definition a mediator/intercessor represents two distinct parties, other than Himself. The Oneness Pentecostal movements generally teach that to receive and maintain salvation, a person must adhere to four essential requirements. dual nature of Christ," but my heart sank when I found nothing which properly explained these things against a Trinitarian argument. Sorry, there was a problem loading this page. These are great questions and wonderful references. 2:5). Hence, exegetically these passages do not indicate that the Son was a mere instrument of creation (as Jehovahs Witnesses and Mormons believe), nor, as Oneness teachers argue, these passages indicate that the Son was only a thought or plan in the Fathers mind when the Father (Jesus divine nature) created all things.